
Below is an extract of a post published on Guardian titled "Even deepfakes may have a grain of truth | Letter"
Scroll down to the bottom of this article and tap the read article button to visit the Guardian post directly and give your opinion.
Make america great again.- Donald Trump.

What counts is not necessarily the size of the dog in the fight. It's the size of the fight in the dog.- Dwight D. Eisenhower.

The best executive is the one who has sense enough to pick good men to do what wants done, and self-restraint to keep from meddling with them while they do it.- Theodore Roosevelt.

Discipline is the soul of an army. It makes small numbers formidable; procures success to the weak and esteem to all.- George Washington.
America 1st Girl is a Blog by Conservative Artist Cara Sky.
Essentially i Blog on all things Donald Trump and on occasion post my own Art.
I curate Donald Trump articles and notable Tweets on your behalf from all over the web into one easy site for you to browse without trolling through hundreds of different sites or posts.
America 1st Girl is not affiliated with the journalist or Twitter user who published the original article or Tweet, nor is she responsible for any affiliations the journalist or Tweeter user in question may hold.
Everything here on America 1st Girl is Donald Trump related from Media to Podcasts, Forums, Blogs and Fan groups.
Via: Guardian
With many possible levels of meaning, the concept of ‘fake’ is deeply flawed, writes Brian Smith “Have you seen Barack Obama call Donald Trump a ‘complete dipshit’, or Mark Zuckerberg brag about having ‘total control of billions of people’s stolen data’?” your briefing on deepfakes asks (Journal, 13 January). Yet these examples show that the concept of “fake” is deeply flawed. For the statements are true, though in fact not made by the purported utterer, and we know that any such statements are always “difficult”, and are artifice of some sort. On any level other than the superficial, deepfakes are deeply problematical. It’s the same with, say, a portrait. If I show a picture of a worm, titled “Portrait of a PM”, you wouldn’t say “That’s not a portrait of a PM”. And we don’t just say “There is Trump saying something”, but rather process it on a number of levels. Perhaps we need a painting subtitled “Ceci n’est pas un deepfake”. What would it be “of”? Brian Smith Berlin, Germany • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com Continue reading…
